Sangrur District Court Adhoc Question Paper Part 31, English shorthand Steno-Typist Paper provide kiya geya hai, Jo Apko knowledge gain and test ke liye prepare karne ke liye helpful rahega.
Har saal District Courts and High Courts mai Steno papers, Adhoc steno papers, hote rehte hai, inki language kafi had tak same hi hoti hai.
Aap yeh paper dekh kar easily practice kar sakte hai, in future apko aur bhi court shorthand papers provide kiye jayenge.
Punjab and Haryana High Court, District Court (Steno Adhoc Exams) mai 80 wpm speed 5 minutes mai bole geya tha, aur agey bhi aisi hi dictation court steno exam mai boli jaa sakti hai.
Aap daily website se court dictations, english steno dictations practice karte jaye, aap bahut jaldi perfection hasil karlenge.
80 WPM Court Steno Paper
- Paragraph 5 Minutes
- Words 400
- Transcribed Time 20 Minutes
- Reading Time- 1 Minutes
Joining Words Outlines Highlighted
This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has come about by the petitioner Rani Thakur then complainant
who had initially filed a complaint in a court at Chandigarh
under Sections 494 and 120 IPC pertaining to Police Station
Sector 19 Chandigarh. When nothing tangible transpired led to the filing of the present petition. In her prayer, the
petitioner seeks registration of criminal case against SHO Ms. Poonam Talwar and other police officials of Police Station Sector 17
including her alleged husband 80
Rajveer Singh and his unnamed associates. Heard Advocate for the petitioner and Addl. Public Prosecutor U.T. Chandigarh for the respondent State and perused the
records. The complainant filed the complaint on 02.September.2011 attributing acts of malafide conduct against the police
officials as well as the husband in which an inquiry by a senior functionary of police too was got conducted. The
allegation in the complaint is that the complainant claims to have married Rajveer Singh on 23.July.1996 at Delhi after 80
courtship of three years in Lakshmi Temple New Delhi. Further alleging that the
accused husband Rajveer Singh had committed bigamy (द्विविवाह का प्रथा) as
he was already married with Diksha out of which he had children. The concerned Court summoned some of the accused
in the complaint vide order dated 20.October.2011 and thereafter the husband Rajveer Singh went in for
revision before the Court of learned Sessions Judge who remanded the
case back for compliance of provisions of Section 202
Cr.P.C. vide and 80 thus, the impugned order for holding of inquiry which was got conducted by SHO of
police Station Sector 19 Chandigarh. It is on this score the
allegations have come about on the imputation that the inquiry was conducted by joining the complainant as well as
accused. When the latter had no role to play at that point of
time and, therefore, could not participate in such proceedings.
The allegations are that it was an outcome of connivance
this manipulation had 80 come about whereby the counsel of Rajveer Singh prepared the report of findings of inquiry under
Section 202 Cr.P.C. and to which the police had relied upon and
hence the complaint. The contentions of Addl. Public Prosecutor
U.T. Chandigarh for the respondent State that on the allegations in which the persons named as accused were exonerated
and that subsequently at a belated stage on contradictory stand a belated
private complaint had come about by way of revenge and vengeance. 80
Court Previous Steno Papers PDF File
More Court Shorthand Papers:
Facebook messenger par Comment and neeche message karke aap English Shorthand related koi bhi information le sakte hai.
Post a Comment