Sangrur District Court Adhoc Question Paper  Part 31, English shorthand Steno-Typist Paper provide kiya geya hai, Jo Apko  knowledge gain and test ke liye prepare karne ke liye helpful rahega.

Sangrur District Court Adhoc Question Paper (Part-31)

Har saal District Courts and High Courts mai Steno papers, Adhoc steno papers, hote rehte hai, inki language kafi had tak same hi hoti hai.

Aap yeh paper dekh kar easily practice kar sakte hai, in future apko aur bhi court shorthand papers provide kiye jayenge.

Punjab and Haryana High Court, District Court (Steno Adhoc Exams) mai 80 wpm speed 5 minutes mai bole geya tha, aur agey bhi aisi hi dictation court steno exam mai boli jaa sakti hai. 

Aap daily website se court dictationsenglish steno dictations practice karte jaye, aap bahut jaldi perfection hasil karlenge.

80 WPM Court Steno Paper

Steno Typist Paper Part- 31

  • Paragraph 5 Minutes
  • Words 400
  • Transcribed Time 20 Minutes
  • Reading Time- 1 Minutes

Joining Words Outlines Highlighted

This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has come about by the petitioner Rani Thakur then complainant who had  initially filed a complaint in a court at Chandigarh under Sections 494 and 120 IPC pertaining to Police Station Sector 19 Chandigarh. When nothing tangible transpired led to the filing of the present petition. In her prayer, the petitioner seeks registration of criminal case against SHO Ms. Poonam Talwar and other police officials of Police Station Sector 17 including her alleged husband 80 Rajveer Singh and his unnamed associates. Heard Advocate for the petitioner and Addl. Public Prosecutor U.T. Chandigarh for the respondent State and perused the records. The complainant filed the complaint on 02.September.2011 attributing acts of malafide conduct against the police officials as well as the husband in which an inquiry by a senior functionary of police too was got conducted. The allegation in the complaint is that the complainant claims to have married Rajveer Singh on 23.July.1996 at Delhi after 80 courtship of three years in Lakshmi Temple New Delhi. Further alleging that the
accused husband Rajveer Singh had committed bigamy (द्विविवाह का प्रथाas he was already married with Diksha out of which he had children. The concerned Court summoned some of the accused in the complaint vide order dated 20.October.2011 and thereafter the husband Rajveer Singh went in for revision before the Court of learned Sessions Judge who remanded the case back for compliance of provisions of Section 202 Cr.P.C. vide and 80 thus, the impugned order for holding of inquiry which was got conducted by SHO of police Station Sector 19 Chandigarh. It is on this score the allegations have come about on the imputation that the inquiry was conducted by joining the complainant as well as accused. When the latter had no role to play at that point of time and, therefore, could not participate in such proceedings. The allegations are that it was an outcome of connivance this manipulation had 80 come about whereby the counsel of Rajveer Singh prepared the report of findings of inquiry under Section 202 Cr.P.C. and to which the police had relied upon and hence the complaint. The contentions of Addl. Public Prosecutor U.T. Chandigarh for the respondent State that on the allegations  in which the persons named as accused were exonerated and that subsequently at a belated stage on contradictory stand a belated private complaint had come about by way of revenge and vengeance. 80

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post