English Steno Question Paper Part 17, English shorthand Steno-Typist Paper provide kiya geya hai, Jo Apko  knowledge gain and test ke liye prepare karne ke liye helpful rahega.

English Steno Exam Question Paper Part-17

Har saal District Courts and High Courts mai Steno papers,Adhoc steno papers, hote rehte hai, inki language kafi had tak same hi hoti hai.

Aap yeh paper dekh kar easily practice kar sakte hai, in future apko aur bhi court shorthand papers provide kiye jayenge.

Punjab and Haryana High Court, District Court (Steno Adhoc Exams) mai 80 wpm speed 5 minutes mai bole geya tha, aur agey bhi aisi hi dictation court steno exam mai boli jaa sakti hai.

Aap daily website se court dictationsenglish steno dictations practice karte jaye, aap bahut jaldi perfection hasil karlenge.

80 WPM Steno Paper

Steno Typist Paper Part- 17

Match Paragraph

Once the workmen were on strike, apparently there was no reason for issuance of such a notice, hence, it can safely be opined that the stand of the management that the workers are on strike since may April is incorrect  as the factory was in production till and closed thereafter for reasons other than is incorrect as the refusal of the workers to work. The order of reference is open to judicial review if it is shown that the appropriate government has not applied (1) its mind or has not taken into consideration certain relevant facts which it ought to have taken into consideration. The entire material available has to be considered. Reference of dispute is to arise out of the material available. Any strike or lock-out has to be both legal and justified. A lock-out declared in consequence of an illegal strike may be legal and justified. The power conferred on the appropriate government under Section 10 of the Act is discretionary and (2) administrative in nature, though subject to judicial review. It is the gist of judgments on which reliance has been placed upon by learned counsel for the parties. If the facts of the present case are considered in the light of enunciation of law on the subject and after finding that the stand taken by the management that the employees had resorted to illegal strike on to be incorrect and there being no material on record to inspire confidence (3) on the plea raised by the management that there was refusal on the part of the workmen to work, coupled with the stand taken by them in the written statement filed before this court at the very first instance that they have no objection to the removal of finished goods from the factory and also join duties as and when asked for, in my opinion, no illegality has been committed by the appropriate government while referring the dispute pertaining to only (4) the lock-out and not the strike, as is sought to be claimed by the management. It is not a case in which the workmen had earlier resorted to any unlawful means or indulged in any illegal activities, like violence etc. They had been resorting to their legal remedies while raising the dispute before the appropriate government and had been cooperating throughout the proceedings. For the reasons mentioned above. I do not find any merit in the present petition. Accordingly the same (5)

More Shorthand Papers:

Comment karke aap English Shorthand related koi bhi information le sakte hai.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post