English Steno Question Paper Part 13, English Steno-Typist Paper provide kiya jaa raha hai, Jo Apko knowledge gain and test ke liye prepare karne mai helpful rahega.
Har saal Poore India mai alag alag High Courts mai Steno papers hote rehte hai, inki language kafi had tak same hi hoti hai.
Aap yeh paper dekh kar easily practice kar sakte hai, in future apko aur bhi court shorthand papers provide kiye jayenge.
Yeh paper Punjab and Haryana High Court mai 80 wpm speed 5 minutes mai bole geya tha, aur agey bhi aisi hi dictation court steno exam mai boli jaa sakti hai.
Aap daily website se court dictations, english steno dictations practice karte jaye, aap bahut jaldi perfection hasil karlenge.
80 WPM Steno Dictation 5 Minute
Steno Typist Paper Part- 13
Match Paragraph
In the aforesaid factual matrix, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that once in view of various orders passed by this court and Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the petitions filed by the accused, SIT was constituted which, after thorough enquiry, found that in fact the accused already named in the FIR were not real culprits, as the offence had been committed by someone else, the State had rightly filed the application seeking withdrawal of prosecution. No one should (1) have been made to face prosecution if he was not involved in the crime. It has direct relation with his liberty. On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 supported the case set up by the petitioner. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that it is a case of blatant misuse of powers by the State. The respondents were accused in the FIR registered initially, however, with change of power, respondent No. 1, who has affiliation with the party (2) in power in the State, got everything turned around. Even after the challan had been presented and charges had been framed against the accused, a fresh SIT was constituted, which gave its tailor-made report in favour of the accused and on that basis, application for withdrawal of prosecution against the accused was filed, which was rightly rejected by the learned court below He further submitted that special interest of the State in the case in hand is established from the (3) fact that the present petition seeking setting aside of the order passed by the court below rejecting the application under Section 321 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking, withdrawal of prosecution was filed by the State impleading only the accused as the respondents. None of the complainants was made the respondent to contest the claim. When the complainants came to know, they moved the application seeking intervention as party. The trial of the accused in the present case when (4) the charges had already been framed, cannot be said to be abuse of process of law. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book. In the case in hand, FIR was registered against the respondents on appearance. After investigation, challan was presented in court, on which charges were framed against the respondents on appearance. One of the main accused in the FIR was charge sheeted by the court to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be innocent (5)
See Steno Topics:
Comment karke aap English Shorthand related koi bhi information le sakte hai.
Post a Comment